HOW VERY JERRY
Normally, whatever his other faults, Robert
Bobb is a pretty down-to-earth kind of guy. Bobb is not the one who carries the nickname
"moonbeam." But the other night when Jerry Brown presented his police tax
proposal to City Council, it was the City Manager, not the Mayor, who came up with
the most otherworldly comment.
Several speakers, including two or three Councilmembers, had complained
that the Mayor’s plan was thin on specifics on how the proposed 100 new police would
be used to combat the violent crime epidemic in Oakland, especially the rising number
of murders. To which the City Manager replied that, actually, the City was right
now working on a "comprehensive crime prevention plan," which was being
tested in "focus groups" around Oakland, even as he spoke.
Reminded me of the scene in the movie "Alien" when Ashe,
the robot science officer, is still "compiling data" on the shipboard computer
after half the crew of the Nostradamus has been wiped out by the alien intruder.
And so, with a soaring murder rate that will likely bring us over
one hundred citizens killed by the end of the year, and four years after Jerry Brown
first ran for the Oakland mayor’s office with a promise to bring down violent crime
in the city, we learn that his administration is just now getting around to developing
a "comprehensive crime prevention plan" to do so.
So what plan were they working on these past couple of years when
they were transferring all those officers from the community policing units to street
patrol?
And so it will be the November elections before Oakland voters
can consider Jerry Brown’s proposed hotel, parking, and utility tax hikes to raise
$70 million for added police protection in the city. And, oh, how very Jerry a protection
plan it is.
The Mayor’s plan requires the Mayor to do absolutely nothing more
about crime in Oakland this summer than he’s already doing. He says he needs more
money to fulfill his duties and his campaign promises. And if we give him more money,
he says he’ll use it to hire 100 new police officers.
100 new police officers is like 10,000 new downtown residents,
one of those Jerry-rigged whole numbers, which roll off of the political tongue quite
well, but do not necessarily comport with the realities or the needs of the moment.
Sure, 100 new police officers may sound like great news to some residents or merchants
along Center or Holly or Market or International. But how many of those 100 new police
officers will actually be doing patrol duty in the highest-crime areas, and what
will be their assignments? The devil is in the details, and supplying Oaklanders
with details has never been Jerry Brown’s strong suit.
The tax plan was presented to City Council on the last possible
date to be placed put on the November ballot. Dick Spees, who supports the added
police, worried about the effect the hotel tax might have on Oakland’s ailing tourist
industry, and wished there was more time to talk about alternatives. Nancy Nadel
offered a compelling and credible alternative plan to spend the proposed new tax
revenue, putting more emphasis on preventing crime before it happens, including such
things as city jobs for Oakland’s large number of parolees. But there wasn’t any
time to talk about that, either.
And that pretty much seems to suit Jerry Brown. The 100 police
tax measure on November’s ballot is a take-it-or-leave-it proposition, which clears
the Mayor of any responsibility for the city’s rising violent crime wave. It’s like
a "pin" move in chess. If voters reject his tax in November, count on Brown
to make his usual trash-Oakland statements, saying that he tried his best, but Oakland
really didn’t want to "step up to the plate." And if voters accept his
proposed tax? City staff projected that the first of the new 100 officers won’t hit
the streets until November of 2004. So by the time we can expect any results the
Mayor will be on his way out the door, and if the proposed tax doesn’t fix the problem,
the rest of us will have to clean up the mess the Mayor leaves behind.
How very Jerry.